If we don’t rebel, if we’re not physically in an active rebellion, then it’s spiritual death.” ― Chris Hedges

Tuesday, March 30, 2010


From The Principality of Rangeview website....
(Geographical Location: via Gratton, Queensland Australia 4343)

‘A number of people wrongly believe that Australia became a nation in 1901’.

...It is unfortunate that some 'experts' on law go around spreading this nonsense. One such person, who is without excuse, is the Chief Justice of the purported High Court of Australia, Mr Anthony Murray Gleeson. (Gleeson was appointed Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia in May 1998. He graduated in Arts and Law from the University of Sydney) In one of Gleeson's 'Boyer Lecture series' ‘The Rule of Law and the Constitution’ he stated the following: “The Australian nation came into existence on 1st January 1901 when the Constitution came into legal effect.” As mentioned further above, Clause 8 of the [63 & 64 VICT] Constitution of Australia [CH 12] Constitution Act reads,  “After the passing of this Act the Colonial Boundaries Act, 1895, shall not apply to any colony which becomes a State of the Commonwealth; but the Commonwealth shall be a self-governing colony for the purposes of the Act.” And Clause 2 of the Act reads: “The provisions of this Act referring to the Queen shall extend to Her Majesty’s heirs and successors in the sovereignty of the United Kingdom”. Now refer to the book 'The Annotated Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia', by Quick and Garran. See on web at http://setis.library.usyd.edu.au/ozlit/pdf/fed0014.pdf (Quick and Garran were involved in the creation of the Constitution Act. Their book is one which students and practitioners of law know as the 'bible' of constitutional commentary) "Commonwealth" SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TERM - The term "Commonwealth," to designate the Australian colonies, united in a Federal Constitution, was first proposed by the Constitutional Committee of the Federal Convention held in Sydney in 1891. ........ .... In both Conventions other names were submitted for consideration, such as "United Australia", "Federated Australia", "The Australian Dominion", "The Federated States of Australia", &c., but the Commonwealth was generally accepted,... ...In this Act the word is used to describe the new political community created by the union of people and of the colonies of Australia. Although it is capable of conveying the idea of a nation like the American Commonwealth, it does not, in its application to Australia, aspire to convey that meaning except in a restricted and potential sense. At the same time it is distinctly intended to signify that the newly-organised political society, forming a conspicuously integral part of the British empire, is entitled to a more dignified status and recognition in the international arena than that assigned to the most distinguished of the colonies or the most powerful of the provinces out of which it has been construed. Regarding land tenure (tenure = the right to hold property; part of an ancient hierarchical system of holding lands) Under International, and purported Australian law, the Crown in the right of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland no longer has any jurisdiction within Australia. ...There is no 'Queen of Australia'. In 1971 the United Kingdom Parliament passed the 'Immigration and Asylum Act (amended in 1972 and 1973) which deprived Australians of British citizenship thereby making them 'aliens'. The Crown, in the name of the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland cannot rule over 'alien' Australians. Since the Crown in the right of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland no longer has any jurisdiction within the territories of Australia, I, Lyall Lindsay Sempf own my land under fee simple title under no tenure to any crown. Radical title in Australia by the Crown does not exist. << See explanation of radical title.  Quick & Garran's Commentary - Constitution http://setis.library.usyd.edu.au/ozlit/pdf/fed0014.pdf

Friday, March 19, 2010

Fake Al Qaeda

"The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the 'devil' only in order to drive the TV watcher to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US . . ." -- Former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook

"Ana raicha Al Qaeda" is colloquial for "I'm going to the toilet". A very common and widespread use of the word "Al-Qaeda" in different Arab countries in the public language is for the toilet bowl. This name comes from the Arabic verb "Qa'ada" which mean "to sit", pertinently, on the "Toilet Bowl". In most Arabs homes there are two kinds of toilets: "Al-Qaeda" also called the "Hamam Franji" or foreign toilet, and "Hamam Arabi" or "Arab toilet" which is a hole in the ground. Lest we forget it, the potty used by small children is called "Ma Qa'adia" or "Little Qaeda". 

So, if you were forming a terrorist group, would you call yourself, "The Toilet"?

Yids pretend to be Muslim terrorists!

The FBI lists Adam Yahiye Gadahn's aliases as Abu Suhayb Al-Amriki, Abu Suhayb, Yihya Majadin Adams, Adam Pearlman, and Yayah.
But Adam Pearlman is his REAL name! Adam is the grandson of the late Carl K. Pearlman; a prominent Jewish urologist in Orange County. Carl was also a member of the board of directors of the Anti-Defamation League, which was caught spying on Americans for Israel in 1993, much as AIPAC has been caught up in the more recent spy scandal.

Images from official FBI wanted poster for terrorist Adam Yahiye Gadahn -

The Coward Yids Always Get Their Arses Kicked By Real Soldiers

Round 3  ‘Israel Offense Farce (IOF) vs 'Hizb'Allah'
January 23, 2010
Lebanese pro-West prime minister Saad Hariri seems sure that Zionazis are going to find some lame excuse to invade Lebanon in the near future. While in Paris, on Thursday he sought guarantees against Israeli aggression from both French premier Frabcious Fillon and France’s Zionist Jew foreign minister Bernard Kouchner. Both working for the former Mossad operative, French president Sarkozy, refused any such guarantees. However, Bernard Kouchner was more blunt to show his “Iranophobia” by saying: “Israeli guarantees can only be given by Israel. However, the situation in Iran might prompt officials in Tehran to behave unpredictably, which could prove dangerous (for Lebanon) given Hizb’Allah weapons, and could lead to unfortunate events.
On his part Saad Hariri told both Zionists: “we want a peace that allows Arabs to recover their land in the Shebaa Farms, the Ghajar Hills and the Golan Heights, as well as a Palestinian state that guarantees the refugees’ (forced to live in Lebanese refugee camps and other lands) right to return”.
Zionist ‘armchair’ ME experts in Tel Aviv and Washington believe that once Tel Aviv succeeds in bribing Damascus – all Israeli problems in the Middle East would be resolved. That’s why Olmer requested Erdogan to negotiate a ‘deal’ with Assad on behalf of Israel. However, the idiots don’t realize that the real political power in Gaza, Lebanon and Iraq is Islamic Iran and not Syria. Therefore, unless Zionazi leaders start behaving like rational human beings towards Tehran – there will never be a peace for Israel.
According to one of the eleven Hizb’Allah members in Parliament, Ali Fayyad, Zionist entity could invade Lebanon for stealing water from the Hasbaya and Wazani Rivers, “a time bomb that could explode any minute”.
As for who the IOF will be fighting its “Round 3″ is concerned – both Benjamin Netanyahu and Michel Suleiman has admitted that Hizb’Allah is the real defenders of Lebanon’s borders. Hizb’Allah has already won Round 1 (2000) and Round 2 (2006) against IOF. Even Israel’s Winograd Commission report (headed by Zionist entity Supreme Court Justice Eliyahu Winograd) admitted Hizb’Allah’s fighting superiority over Israel Occupation Force (IOF) cowards: “A semi-military organization of a few thousand men resisted, for a few weeks (34-days), the strongest army in the Middle East, which enjoyed full air superiority and size (30,000 soldiers during the final days of 2006 war) and technological advantages……”
During 2006 war, Israeli Hasbara (propaganda) department hired additional 100,000 Jewish duped students to flood the internet with Zionist lies about Hizb’Allah, Iran, Muslim Brotherhood and Islam. However, at the end of the war, Israeli officials admitted that Hizb’Allah had beaten them in that field too.
Earlier, Sheikh Nasrallah in his message to the Arab-International Forum for Supporting the Resistance, said: “I promise you, as I have always promised you. In any coming confrontation, we will foil the aggression’s objectives, defeat the enemy, achieve a great historical victory and change the face of the region.”