If we don’t rebel, if we’re not physically in an active rebellion, then it’s spiritual death.” ― Chris Hedges

Wednesday, September 01, 2010

Australian voters hostage to an Economist dictating Policy on Climate Gate!

I have just sat through another shill-fest at the Australian National Press Club: The speaker was ‘Lord’ Nick Stern: Nick Stern is a SHILL for the Global government Crime syndicate; ‘IG Patel Professor of Economics and Government London School of Economics.’ What Benjamin Netanyahu refers to as a “Useful Idiot”.

Climate Change policies are not about protecting the environment from corporate polluters; they are about a Worldwide Tax that will go straight to the IMF (International Monetary Fund) – Wall street Banksters control the IMF!

How will a tax that is absorbed into the account of the IMF, (a notoriously corrupt and manipulative ‘front’ for the hidden global government) stop our rivers and forests from being polluted and burned?


The Yiddish Crooks that control international banking are the corporate polluters abusing and exploiting our environment.

Shut up Stern! There is no genuine Data to support your bullshit about anthropomorphic ‘Global Warming’.

The Green Party in Australia was a faction of the Communist Party of Australia. Since deregistration of the CPA (no-one was turning up for meetings because that old grey mare is well-dead) the Greens have been the village idiots touting for the zionazis. their magazine is called The Green Left; anyone?

So, just like ‘Global Warming’, remarketed as ‘Climate Change’, the CPA has morphed into The Green Party. Bob Brown should GET A REAL JOB!

“The main objective criticism of the carbon-based warming model is that it is not proved. That’s different from saying it’s not true. It may or may not be true. However, until it is conclusively shown to be true and the results can be reproduced, it would be unwise public policy to embark on a trillion dollar amelioration program, with far-reaching economic, social and environmental effects. Government normally intervenes when there is a compelling public interest to do so. It should never intervene on the basis of an uncertain bet. Government is not the racetrack where bureaucrats can bet taxpayer money on the horses they fancy.” November 29, 2009 - by Richard Fernandez

It only takes a few seconds, truly, just a few seconds to get access to proven scientific data that completely disproves the scam data that is being touted around the world by the Media owned by the same Banksters who own the IMF.


Image: NASA / Goddard Institute for Space Studies – Maps from NASA’s GISS reveal temperatures where no data exist, thanks to mathematical extrapolation of data.
NASA was able to put a man on the moon, but the space agency can’t tell you what the temperature was when it did. By its own admission, NASA’s temperature records are in even worse shape than the besmirched Climate-gate data.

“For many years now, human-caused climate change has been viewed as a large and urgent problem. In truth, however, the biggest part of the problem is neither environmental nor scientific, but a self-created political fiasco. Consider the simple fact, drawn from the official temperature records of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, that for the years 1998-2005 global average temperature did not increase (there was actually a slight decrease, though not at a rate that differs significantly from zero)....”

From Fox News: A critical cog in the machinery that drives the theory of global warming is a small white box not too far from where you live. Inside the box sits a thermometer that tracks the local temperature, which in turn becomes part of a data trail for the monitoring of climate change on Earth.

But there's a problem: Nearly every single weather station the U.S. government uses to measure the country's surface temperature may be compromised. Sensors that are supposed to be in empty clearings are instead exposed to crackling electronics and other unlikely sources of heat, from exhaust pipes and trash-burning barrels to chimneys and human graves.

For the past three years, a group of zealous laymen has visited and photographed nearly every one of the weather stations to determine whether they have been placed properly. And what they found is a stunning disregard for the government's own rules: 90 percent of the sensors are too close to potential sources of heat to pass muster, including some very odd sources indeed:

"So far we've surveyed 1,062 of them," said Anthony Watts, a meteorologist who began the tracking effort in 2007. "We found that 90 percent of them don't meet [the government's] old, simple rule called the '100-foot rule' for keeping thermometers 100 feet or more from biasing influence. Ninety percent of them failed that, and we've got documentation."

Watts, who has posted pictures of the sensors on his Web site, SurfaceStations.org, says he believes that the location of the sensors renders their recorded temperatures inaccurate, which in turn brings some of the data behind global warming theory into question.

"It's asinine to think that this wouldn't have some kind of an effect," Watts told FoxNews.com.

Australian Climategaters agree, however, they agree for the opposite reasons: “A change in the type of thermometer shelter [accurate ones huh?] used at many Australian observation sites in the early 20th century resulted in a sudden drop in recorded temperatures which is entirely spurious [why?]. It is for this reason that these early data are currently not used for monitoring climate change [How convenient!]. Other common changes at Australian sites over time include location moves, construction of buildings or growth of vegetation around the observation site and, more recently, the introduction of Automatic Weather Stations.”

Research suggests that the warming is also strongly linked to a temporary shift in Pacific currents, known as El Niño, which has caused the ocean to release large amounts of heat into the atmosphere....
Kevin Trenberth, head of climate analysis at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Colorado, said: “We have seen rapid warming recently, but it is an example of natural variation that is associated with changes in the Pacific rather than climate change.”

John Christy, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, was cautious about predicting record temperatures for 2010, pointing out that the global datasets for temperature had flaws that could lead to rises being overstated [due to false positive data].
He said: “Be wary of climate forecasts...”

The simple answer to all this bullshit is: show us the data used by the alarmists when they shriek and scream: “The Sky is falling!”
Oops, of course, they can’t show us the data it doesn’t exist; it was all accidentally deleted, yep all of it. Sounds like the data they won’t show us regarding the cause of the 911 collapses, particularly building seven, which wasn’t even hit by a plane.

But 911’s another scam topic; I will get back to that doozy later, when I state my case for withdrawing our soldiers from Osamasdeadistan. Or is it israhelldid911istan. Or is it Unocalistan. Or is it Heroineistan. Or is it Karzaisathugistan. Or is it mossadistan. Or is it Genocideistan. Or is it protocolsofzionistan. Or is it Bonanzaforthemilitaryindustrialcomplexistan. Or is it Alloftheaboveistan????

So, in summing up, let me just say BUUUULLLSHHHIIIT!!!

Climate change is about the SUN and solar flares not cow’s fartz and the stuff that plants and trees breathe!

Australia needs a government that doesn’t suck-up to the yiddish crime syndicate. Wouldn’t that be nice, mmm?


Anonymous said...

"Climate Change policies are not about protecting the environment from corporate polluters; they are about a Worldwide Tax that will go straight to the IMF (International Monetary Fund) – Wall street Banksters control the IMF!
How will a tax that is absorbed into the account of the IMF, (a notoriously corrupt and manipulative ‘front’ for the hidden global government) stop our rivers and forests from being polluted and burned?

well said,

you are really skilled at explaining things that need to be explained and better understood by more people in a succint understandable way,

veritas6464 said...

Hey Craig,..Thanks mate.