If we don’t rebel, if we’re not physically in an active rebellion, then it’s spiritual death.” ― Chris Hedges

Monday, May 30, 2011

Powerful anti-zionist message: Hilarious video spoofing Beatles classic!


Free Palestine!

Smart Bomb, Drone precision bombardment The Knesset Now! Fingers crossed for massive collateral fatalities.

veritas6464
 
TRUTH IS NOT RACIST | FACTS ARE NOT HATE

Friday, May 27, 2011

What there is to say about filthy yiddish khazars...

Sucking a childs penis is normal, NOT!
18 Quotes about the tribe of mendicant miscreants!

001

VOLTAIRE (Francois Marie Arouet) 18th century French philosopher, writer:

"Why are the Jews hated? It is the inevitable result of their laws; they either have to conquer everybody or be hated by the whole human race..."

"The Jewish nation dares to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous - cringing in misfortune and insolent in prosperity." (Essai sur le Moeurs)

Let's call it what it is!
"You seem to me to be the maddest of the lot. The Kaffirs, the Hottentots, and the Negroes of Guinea are much more reasonable and more honest people than your ancestors, the Jews. You have surpassed all nations in impertinent fables in bad conduct and in barbarism. You deserve to be punished, for this is your destiny." (From a letter to a Jew who had written to him, complaining of his 'anti-Semitism.' Examen des Quelques Objections...dans L'Essai sur le Moeurs.)

002

"You will only find in the Jews an ignorant and barbarous people, who for a long time have joined the most sordid avarice to the most detestable superstition and to the most invincible hatred of all peoples which tolerate and enrich them." ("Juif," Dictionnaire Philosophique)
Bless me rabbi for I (?) have sinned?

003

"I know that there are some Jews in the English colonies. These marranos go wherever there is money to be made...But whether these circumcised who sell old clothes claim that they are of the tribe of Naphtali or Issachar is not of the slightest importance. They are, simply, the biggest scoundrels who have ever dirtied the face of the earth." (Letter to Jean-Baptiste Nicolas de Lisle de Sales, December 15, 1773. Correspondance. 86:166)

004

"They are, all of them, born with raging fanaticism in their hearts, just as the Bretons and the Germans are born with blond hair. I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race." (Lettres de Memmius a Ciceron, 1771)

005

In La Renovation, journal of the socialist school of CHARLES FOURIER:

"Jews! To the heights of your Sinai...I humbly lift myself. I stand erect and cry out to you, in behalf of all my humble equals, of all those whom your spoliation has brought to grief, who died in misery through you and whose trembling shades accuse you: Jews! For Cain and Iscariot, leave us, leave us! Ah, cross the Red Sea again, and go down there to the desert, to the promised land which is waiting for you, the only country fit for you; o you wicked, rude and dishonest people, go there!!! ("Israel") E,CANNOT. 19th century French reformer.
Thanks for the porn and venereal diseases

006

"I participated with Herzl in the first Zionist Congress which was held in Basle in 1897. Herzl was the most prominent figure at that first Jewish World Congress. He worked to achieve an object which had been fixed beforehand. Just as Isaiah foresaw, decades before the event occurred, the victorious power of Cyrus before anyone else, so did Herzl foresee twenty years, before we experienced them, the revolutions brought about by the Great War, and he prepared us for that which was going to happen. He foresaw the splitting up of Turkey, and he foresaw that England would obtain control over Palestine. 'We may expect important developments in the world.' These were the words spoken by Herzl twenty years before the Great War. He added that the events would offer the Jewish people fresh opportunities." (The Judisk Tidskrift, No. 6, Aug.-Sept., 1929, written by Dr. Ehrenpreis, Chief Rabbi of Sweden).

007

"Hitler will have no war, but he will be forced into it, not this year but later..." (The Jewish Emil Ludwig, Les Annales, June, 1934)
These twats created a worker's paradise, NOT!

008

"Kill the Germans, wherever you find them! Every German is our moral enemy. Have no mercy on women, children, or the aged! Kill every German -- wipe them out!" (Llya Ehrenburg, Glaser, p. 111).

009

"The millions of Jews who live in America, England and France, North and South Africa, and, not to forget those in Palestine, are determined to bring the war of annihilation against Germany to its final end." (The Jewish newspaper, Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederland, September 13, 1939)

010

"Germany is the enemy of Judaism and must be pursued with deadly hatred. The goal of Judaism of today is: a merciless campaign against all German peoples and the complete destruction of the nation. We demand a complete blockade of trade, the importation of raw materials stopped, and retaliation towards every German, woman and child." (Jewish professor A. Kulischer, October, 1937)


011

"Step by step, I have arrived at the conviction that the aims of Communism in Europe are sinister and fatal. At the Nuremberg Trials, I, together with my Russian colleague, condemned Nazi Aggression and Terror. I believe now that Hitler and the German People did not want war. But we, {England}, declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with our principle of Balance of Power, and we were encouraged by the 'Americans'{Jews} around Roosevelt. We ignored Hitler's pleading, not to enter into war. Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He offered us the co-operation of Germany: instead, since 1945, we have been facing the immense power of the Soviet Empire. I feel ashamed and humiliated to see that the aims we accused Hitler of, are being relentless pursued now, only under a different label." (Ashamed and Humiliated The British Attorney General, Sir Hartle Shawcross, said in a speech at Stourbridge, March 16/84 (AP)).

Someone say child molesters?
012

"Our fight against Germany must be carried to the limit of what is possible. Israel has been attacked. Let us, therefore, defend Israel! Against the awakened Germany, we put an awakened Israel. And the world will defend us." (Jewish author Pierre Creange in his book Epitres aux Juifs, 1938)

013

"Judea declares War on Germany." (Daily Express, March 24, 1934)

014

"Germany must be turned into a waste land, as happened there during the 30-year War." (Das Morgenthau-Tagebuch, The Morgenthau Dairy, p. 11).

015

"The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every conference, in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world. There are reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight is of general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany..." (Valadimir Jabotinsky, in Mascha Rjetsch, January, 1934)017

"In fact, about 600 news-papers were officially banned during 1933. Others were unofficially silenced by street methods. The exceptions included Judische Rundschau, the ZVfD's Weekly and several other Jewish publications. German Zionism's weekly was hawked on street corners and displayed at news stands. When Chaim Arlosoroff visited Zionist headquarters in London on June 1, he emphasized, 'The Rundschau is crucial: Rundschau circulation had in fact jumped to more than 38,000 -- four to five times its 1932 circulation. Although many influential Aryan publications were forced to restrict their page size to conserve newsprint, Judische Rundschau was not affected until mandatory newsprint rationing in 1937.

And while stringent censorship of all German publications was enforced from the outset, Judische Rundschau was allowed relative press freedoms. Although two issues of it were suppressed when they published Chaim Arlosoroff's outline for a capital transfer, such seizures were rare. Other than the ban on anti-Nazi boycott references, printing atrocity stories, and criticizing the Reich, Judische Rundschau was essentially exempt from the so-called Gleichschaltung or 'uniformity' demanded by the Nazi Party of all facets of German society. Juedische Rundschau was free to preach Zionism as a wholly separate political philosophy -- indeed, the only separate political philosophy sanction by the Third Reich." (This shows the Jewish Zionists enjoyed a visibly protected political status in Germany, prior to World War II).
Super race, Haargh! WTF is that!? Nice hat, stop fukn ya sister!

016

"...In Germany the Jews occupy the principal rìles and are first-rate revolutionaries. They are writers, philosophers, poets, orators, publicists, and bankers, and on their heads and in their hearts all the weight of ancient ignominy! They will one day be terrible for Germany...probably followed by a morrow terrible for them." (Rougeyron, 1861; Metternich, 1849; The Trail of the Serpent, Inquire Within, Miss Stoddard, p. 93).

017

"Those who stand too close to the canvas of history while it is being woven will error in their estimate of forces. Minor setbacks will take on the aspects of decisive defeats, minor advances the aspects of major victories. Only in the perspective of all our history - the longest perspective of which any people can boast - shall we be able to estimate the significance of recent events."

018

"He speaks of the War throughout as a German, and gives the impression that Germany ought to have won, and it would have pleased him. He speaks at length of the violation of Belgium, but says not a word of condemnation. He explains the Bolshevist system; he apparently approves of it, as he gives as his own opinion that only the workers ought to have rights, capital is wrong and ought to disappear; means of a living must not depend on work, etc. When you buy a coat, with your money you are buying men's work, and he condemns it! Money should be allowed to buy only goods. (He does not explain the contradictions).

A work of art is, say, in Rome; a 'bourgeois' (capitalist) can go there to see it; his money will command the work of many railway men, etc...to enable him to enjoy the sight of that work or art. Why should a poor worker, to whom it belongs as well as to the bourgeois, not see it? The works of art should be brought to the workers everywhere. Money left with compound interest in a bank will double itself in fourteen years, and yet the capitalist will have remained idle. Money is the power of commandeering other men's work!

There are in England occult societies which inspire English politics. They know the course of evolution for the next few decades, and are using their knowledge for the material advantage of England. The English will try and keep the people east of the Rhine (Middle Europe and Russia) in a weak state by keeping up socialistic institutions among them, in order to exploit their work as slaves, for the benefit of the British Empire as Masters.

It is the English occultists who have caused the Tzar to be overthrown and Bolshevism to gain power. They are making socialistic experiments at the expense of Russia and Middle Europe. But as the English-speaking people (England and America) will only be able to evolve materialistic occultism which ultimately would destroy their evolution, they will make use for their advantage of the other kinds of occultism which their victims will evolve, the hygienic occultism of the German and the eugenic occultism of the Russian and the Asiatics.

Here it is, where it says we own you!
The English occultists are already in possession of knowledge which will soon enable employers to work their machines by some force which will do away with most workmen. The masses of idle workmen will revolt in anger, but the English occultists know of the means which will subdue them. (Steiner does not explain the means!). The cause of the present unrest in Europe is the kind of stuff a 'lazy' clergy has been preaching in the churches for a long time, because its preaching has no connection with men and lives. Steiner explains at length what the Bolshies want and what they have done. While he never misses a chance of insulting the churches he is very polite about the Bolshies and is careful even to say that he is not criticizing them. When explaining what they have done with their opponents he does not use the word 'murder' or even 'execution'; he says they have 'chased them away' or got rid of them.

About British politics he says they are very powerful, and will succeed in ruling the world because they are essentially selfish; he says that selfishness must not be criticized, as it is part of the evolution, the development of self-consciousness. The French are finished, because their qualities of logic, intellect, reason, etc., are merely the perfecting of the Roman civilization. The only nation in the world that knows right from wrong is the German Nation (1918)! Steiner is apparently so anxious to show that he means what he says, that he adds: 'The other nations do not understand anything about it at all.' German politics are always idealistic!

200 years of emancipation down the shitter!
The telephone, wireless, express trains, and other modern conveniences have been placed at our service at the cost of misery to millions of workers. It was very easy for the early English Theosophists in the second half of the nineteenth century to take kindly to the new teaching in their comfortable rooms well-heated with coal extracted in the terrible conditions to which they never gave a thought. Humanity as a collective whole is on the verge of going over the threshold more or less consciously, and this momentous step will be done by the proletariat. If proletariat thinking is still chaotic and wrong, it is because it is still imitating bourgeois mentality.

As far back as 1880 the Anglo-American occult leaders, directing the political leaders, knew about the coming World War and prepared for it. The German leaders knew nothing, and would not take warning, that is why they lost! The physical war was easily won by England, but it will be followed by a spiritual war between East and West (East - India, Russia, and German; West - Anglo-America), which will be much more dangerous for the West. For instance, India, which is half starving (according to Mrs. Besant!), will rebel and be helped by powerful spiritual forces our of her past. Germany must fulfil her mission, otherwise the European civilization will be ruined."

(Rudolph Steiner, lecture given at Stuttgart in 1918; Light-Bearers of Darkness, by Inquire Within, pp. 78-79).

Free Palestine!

veritas6464

TRUTH IS NOT RACIST | FACTS ARE NOT HATE

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Got kids? Got Freedom? Got Privacy? WATCH THIS VIDEO NOW!

This guy rocks and he's a Dad...



 

Oh, I forgot to mention; this Post is dedicated to a mate of mine that we (in the know) call Timster. One day I'm gonna have a beer with "Timster" coz he rocks!

TRUTH IS NOT RACIST | FACTS ARE NOT HATE

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Palestinian school-girl shot in the head by evil cowards of the yiddish occupation; JooSA company prints T-shirts: they don’t care about the little girl: video

In March 2003, 12-year-old Hoda Darwish was sitting at her desk in a UN elementary school in Khan Younis on the Gaza Strip when child-molesting cowards of the IOF (israhelli offence farce) fired high-velocity bullets through her classroom windows. One of the bullets smashed into the little school-girls head, knocking her to the floor. The doctors at the hospital said that little Hoda would never awaken from her coma.

But after two weeks she started to recover. When Hoda woke up she slowly discovered that her life would never be the same again – she had lost her sight.

This poignant film looks at Hoda’s gradual mental and physical rehabilitation at the Rehabilitation Centre in Gaza, as she copes with the daily pain and suffering of her injury and how she rebuilds her confidence, all in a place full of fear and tragedy.

Filmmaker: Johan Eriksson




The “spreadshirt” t-shirt company printed these disgusting T-shirts and list them for sale on their website, I have not been able to ascertain whether this company is owned by yiddish child-molesters or not, however the odds are that this company is yiddish are high, I cannot see a goy company in the USA printed such turpitude:


I have a challenge for the readers that visit here, if you want to DO something to help, if you want to play a peaceful role in the protest against apartheid israhell, here it is:


Each and every one of the 300 to 400 readers I get a day should take one half hour out of their day to email this Company, its Branches and those Companies that support it financially and let them know how disgusted you are that these pigs can be so disrespectful toward the suffering of an innocent little school-girl in The Gaza!

Contact ‘spreadshirt’ t-shirt company for boycott:


Contact branches for boycott:


associated companies for boycott:


spreadshirt have a forum for clients and customers, give’em a blast:





FREE PALESTINE!

veritas6464


TRUTH IS NOT RACIST | FACTS ARE NOT HATE

Monday, May 16, 2011

The Persecution of John Demjanjuk

"John Demjanjuk is a reminder
that those marked as the scapegoat
for the tribe’s punishment
will need eternal vigilance.": Chuckyman.

John Demjanjuk Guilty of Nazi Death Camp Murders,” ran the headline on the BBC. The lead began:
“A German court has found John Demjanjuk guilty of helping to murder more than 28,000 Jews at a Nazi death camp in Poland.”
Not until paragraph 17 does one find this jolting fact: “No evidence was produced that he committed a specific crime.”

That is correct. No evidence was produced; no witness came forward to testify he ever saw Demjanjuk injure anyone. And the critical evidence that put Demjanjuk at Sobibor came — from the KGB.
First was a KGB summary of an alleged interview with one Ignat Danilchenko, who claimed he was a guard at Sobibor and knew Demjanjuk. Second was the Soviet-supplied ID card from the Trawniki camp that trained guards.
There are major problems with both pieces of “evidence.”

First, Danilchenko has been dead for a quarter of a century, no one in the West ever interviewed him, and Moscow stonewalled defence requests for access to the full Danilchenko file. His very existence raises a question.
How could a Red Army soldier who turned collaborator and Nazi camp guard survive Operation Keelhaul, which sent all Soviet POWs back to Joseph Stalin, where they were either murdered or sent to the Gulag?
As for the ID card from Trawniki, just last month there was unearthed at the National Archives in College Park, Md., a 1985 report from the Cleveland office of the FBI, which, after studying the card, concluded it was “quite likely” a KGB forgery.
“Justice is ill-served in the prosecution of an American citizen on evidence which is not only normally inadmissible in a court of law, but based on evidence and allegations quite likely fabricated by the KGB.”
This FBI report, never made public, was done just as Demjanjuk was being deported to Israel to stand trial as “Ivan the Terrible,” the murderer of Treblinka. In a sensational trial covered by the world’s press, Demjanjuk was convicted and sentenced to hang.
But after five years on death row, new evidence turned up when the Soviet Union collapsed and Russia opened up. That evidence wholly validated the claims of Demjanjuk’s defenders.
Not only had Demjanjuk never even been at Treblinka, the Soviet files contained a photograph of the real “Ivan” — a larger and older man.
Pat's new Book Order at Amazon
To its eternal credit, the Israeli Supreme Court reversed the conviction, rejected a request to retry Demjanjuk as a camp guard elsewhere in Poland, freed him and sent him home to America.
Exposed as a laughing stock, and denounced for fraud by Ohio district and appellate courts, the Office of Special Investigations began crafting a new case, John Demjanjuk of Sobibor, to deport and try again the old man whose defence attorneys had made fools of them.
Thus the Sobibor story and Demjanjuk’s supposed complicity in the murder of 28,000 Jews — though, as the BBC notes, no one testified at the trial that they ever saw John Demjanjuk injure anyone.
Consider the life this tormented American has lived.
Born in Ukraine in 1920, as a boy he endured the Holodomor — the famine imposed on his people in 1932 and 1933 by Stalin and his hated henchman Lazar Kaganovich, which resulted in the starvation and death of somewhere between 5 million and 9 million Ukrainians.

It has been called by historians the “forgotten Holocaust.”
Conscripted into the Red Army, Demjanjuk was captured in the German blitzkrieg. Unlike American and British POWs, whom Germans regarded as racial equals, Ukrainians were untermensch who could be used for medical experiments.
Not only did Demjanjuk survive, he managed to evade the Allied order, under Keelhaul, for all Red Army POWs to be repatriated to Stalin, which was the Soviet dictator’s demand before he would return the U.S. and British POWs his troops liberated in the march to Berlin.
In the war’s aftermath, Demjanjuk married his wife Vera, who had been conscripted in the Ukraine and brought forcibly west to work in the German economy.
Thence he moved to Cleveland, became an autoworker, raised a family and practiced his Christian faith. But he made a mistake.

He sent his wife to Ukraine to tell his aged mother that he had survived the war and was living in the great United States of America.
Word got around the village. The KGB came calling. Swiftly, the payments his mother had been receiving for her war hero son were halted, and suddenly, there turned up an ID card that said John Demjanjuk had been trained at Trawniki to be a Nazi camp guard.

The KGB began feeding OSI from its “files,” as OSI began a manic persecution of Demjanjuk that has lasted 30 years.
Stalin died in bed in 1953. Kaganovich died with his family around him in Moscow in 1991. And John Demjanjuk, 91, after spending five years on death row for a crime he did not commit in a place he never was, is stateless and homeless in a Germany where veterans of the SS walk free.
That is justice — in our world.
My Link source: Flogging Dead Horses
Original source: Patrick J. Buchanan
FREE PALESTINE! 
veritas6464 
TRUTH IS NOT RACIST | FACTS ARE NOT HATE

Sunday, May 15, 2011

British 7/7 Researcher Acquitted Of False Charges By Jury


Comment: It is heartening to know that British juries aren't as gullible as their Western Australian counterparts, Brendon O'Connell is serving three years in prison in Western Australia for accusing israhell of being behind 9/11, 7/7 and of being a racist apartheid state.
Jury Rejects State Charges Against 7/7 Ripple Effect's Muad’Dib
 (Source)

At 4pm on Thursday 12th May at Southwark Crown Court the jury returned and declared Muad’Dib (Anthony John Hill) innocent of attempting to ‘pervert the course of justice’.

Mr. Hill has spent 151 days incarcerated in Wandsworth prison over the past few months and this verdict spared him, mercifully, a sentence of up to 20 years in jail.

His offence? He had sent six DVD copies of his film ‘7/7: The Ripple Effect’ to various persons at the time (in 2008) of the trial in Kingston of three ‘terror’ suspects, alleged co-conspirators with the London ‘suicide bombers’. The DVD’s were intercepted and never reached their targets. The Kingston suspects were found innocent (only to later be retried for the same offences, but that’s another story).

israhell did this.
Muad’Dib’s trial started on Monday 9th May, with a challenge to the monarchy and, hence, the authority of the court. This was ruled ‘out of order’ by the judge. On Tuesday a jury were sworn in.

On Wednesday they watched all of his film, ‘ The Ripple Effect’, in open court.

Over the Tuesday and Wednesday the jury heard in-depth discussions of both 7/7 and 9/11, with Mr Hill laying out clearly, and at his own leisurely pace under cross-examination, the reasons he believes that both these ‘attacks by terrorists’ were, in fact, false flag attacks by agencies of the state against its own people carried out with the purpose of providing a pretext for invasion of innocent countries in the middle east in order to control their natural resources.

This was surely the first ever fully-explored set of such allegations of false flag terror made against any state before an ordinary collection of the citizens of that state.

It is also clear from the verdict that, when such information is placed before such ordinary citizens the majority of them ‘get it.’ The jury had announced that it could not be unanimous, so the judge allowed a ‘majority verdict’, i.e. ten or more of the 12.

It is surely not unfair to deduce that Southwark Crown Court’s jury of ordinary persons did not reject Muad’Dib’s false-flag narrative as outrageous or even necessarily untrue. One wonders how many of that jury have now themselves been converted into active ‘troofers’?

And this.
During the trial (on Wednesday) JAH/Hill/Muad’Dib was asked why he moved to Ireland: “To pursue my study of the lost Ark of the Covenant” was his reply. Here is a character, both serious and refreshing, who brings a mythic dimension into life. Onlookers were impressed by the way he was able to conduct himself without fear in the witness-box, sometimes pausing 5-10 seconds to reflect, before replying. A group of  up to 25 supporters attended the four days of the trial, a couple travelling from as far afield as Finland and the state of Montana.

Let’s hope that will be the end of the persecution of Mr JAH by the British state – and, that he soon starts on a 2nd edition of his Ripple Effect.

And this: 52 dead, ordinary folks!
It’s the opinion of Sheffield University social-sciences professor Ridley-Duff, that Mr Hill’s Ripple Effect’s narrative of what happened on that day, is more plausible and better fits the facts than did the BBC’s 7/7 ‘Conspiracy Files‘ program. His well-referenced study focussed very much on what happened at Canary Wharf on that morning, seeing the Ripple narrative, whereby the young alleged bombers had been inveigled into a terror drill that morning, then fled to Canary wharf where they were shot – as the best account yet. The new 3rd edition of my book Terror on the Tube endorses this view. In contrast, the so-called ‘July 7th Truth Campaign’ has scoffed at the Ripple narrative calling it ‘evidence-free conjecture,’ a quite breathtaking (and very revealing) remark.

Watch the 7/7 Doco' here:
Free Palestine!

veritas6464


TRUTH IS NOT RACIST | FACTS ARE NOT HATE

Monday, May 09, 2011

Palestinian Sniper: A real hero the MSM snot-gobblers won’t spin up a frenzy of conformity ‘lurv coverage’ about.

 
A true hero of the Resistance!
On 3rd March 2002, 22-year-old Palestinian, Thaer Hamad from the Ramallah-area village of Silwad, armed with an old WW2, M1 carbine shot 24 Israeli occupation soldiers and their reinforcements at a checkpoint sited in an old British police post on the road between Nablus and Ramallah - before his gun blew up - killing 11 of them in the process in the space of 24 minutes. Hamad hid behind mountain shrubs and olive trees and picked off the soldiers one by one - but spared the lives of an Israeli "settler" woman and her two children who chanced upon the killing zone shouting at them to speed away from his killing field.


His sharpshooting skills were so supernal* [su·per·nal/səˈpərnl/Adjective1. Of or relating to the sky or the heavens; celestial. 2. Of exceptional quality or extent.] and deadly that the unnerved, lying Israelis bruited [Something bruited about is rumoured, passed by word of mouth, exclaimed upon. In its native French, bruit, for 'noise', is pronounced as “bruee”, but in English it is a homonym with “brute”— except when referring to a noise heard during medical auscultation: that is still a bruee.] it abroad that he was either a Provisional IRA or Chechnyan [he means ‘Chechyn’] sniper specially imported for the task.


Palestinian national hero, Thaer Hamad, fondly known as “The Sniper” throughout Palestine and further abroad was arrested on Oct 5th 2004 and is now serving multiple life sentences for his resistance to the, inhuman, Israeli occupation of his land, two, it is reported, commuted for the mercy shown to the “settler” woman and her children.? As editor-in-chief, Hafez Barghouti of Al-Hayat Al-Jadida put it: “This young man should be our top priority, since he entered the history of the Intifada as having carried out the most successful military action, alone...

Thaer Hamed deserves freedom because he is the hero of the Intifada, and he is the only Palestinian resistance fighter who belongs to his people and to his land, spurning the factions, for had he been factional, he would not have succeeded in his action. He acted alone, going out to play solo on the M-1, and did what tens of brigades and platoons, and hundreds of missiles and heroic stories, failed to do. He is made of the same stuff as those who carried out the capture of Shalit, a military action that was successful by any military yardstick, and now he should be freed.”
***
I qualified for my "Crossed Rifles" as a young soldier and I'll tell ya, 11 kills and 24 hits inside 24 minutes with an old M1 Carbine is some serious fucking shootin' dudes! Cooooeeee! No wondering why the yiddish cowards of the IOF (Israhelli Offence Farce) thought they were being Banjo'd by a CIA trained Hitter:

Pick anything off the top shelf son!

See Philip Weiss's article on Mondoweiss's : The legend of the Silwad sniper http://mondoweiss.net/2010/09/the-legend-of-the-silwad-sniper.html#more-26199

*Prae Monitas Prae Munitas: Phil Weiss is from time to time something of an apologist for the zio-nazis and as pretentious as they come, he does however have a talent for ‘Features’ writing.
Fuck israhell!


Free Palestine!

TRUTH IS NOT RACIST | FACTS ARE NOT HATE

Sunday, May 08, 2011

Osama Obama story is BULLSHIT, here's a real story of yankee heroics involving a thirteen year old girl!


Media Scrambles as Bin Laden Story Crumbles
 

Saturday, May 7, 2011


13-year old Iman al-Hams: brutally murdered by IOF.


Iman Darwish al-Hams: shot 17 times by IOF, including several bullets fired into her as her body lay on the ground bleeding to death, in Rafah, southern Gaza in October 2004 for absolutely no reason; Iman was 13 years old.


While the establishment media was busy parroting President Obama’s announcement of Osama bin Laden’s supposed assassination, reporting the unsubstantiated claims as if they were unquestionable facts, much of the so-called “alternative” press was far more cautious — and accurate, it turns out. But more importantly, with the new official storyline indicating that bin Laden was in fact unarmed, bigger and much more important questions are beginning to emerge.
In terms of coverage, it turns out that the skeptical approach proved far superior in terms of getting it right. Countless mainstream sources were so confident in Obama’s word that they reported many of the claims as fact without even attributing them to the President.

But the official White House narrative has been
changed so many times in recent days that now it’s almost unrecognizable. There wasn‘t even a fire fight; yet this was one of the crucial elements of the original story that justified the assassination of a person the government painted as the most valuable source of information on the planet — the leader of al-Qaeda. And in reporting the statements as fact, the establishment press has officially been left with egg all over its face again.

"[Bin Laden] was engaged in a firefight with those that entered the area of the house he was in,"
said terror czar John Brennan. Similarly, Obama said that “after a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body.” The next day, however, the White House spokesman admitted bin Laden “was not armed." Trying to save face and justify the killing of an unarmed man, the spokesman added, without elaborating, that “resistance does not require a firearm."

More than a few other important parts of the storyline have been altered, contradicted, or simply exposed as false, too. Everything from which of  bin Laden’s sons was supposedly killed to the claim that his wife was killed after being used as a “human shield” — all of it has
changed for some reason or another. The transcript after Brennan’s speech was altered to change the name of the dead son. The new and improved narrative now says that not only was bin Laden’s wife not killed, but that she was not used as a human shield.

Originally the White House also suggested top officials watched the raid live through a video feed. Terror czar Brennan, for example,
claimed that they “had real-time visibility into the progress of the operation.” CIA boss Leon Panetta later exposed that claim as false in an interview with PBS, saying: “There was a time period of almost 20 or 25 minutes that we really didn't know just exactly what was going on."

That means the “
photo op” of Obama and other officials intently “watching” the operation in the “Situation Room” was almost certainly staged for the press. And almost every media outlet that ran the picture used inaccurate captions parroting the White House claims.

And there’s more. The night of the raid, one administration official
told reporters that a helicopter was lost due to mechanical failure. During that same briefing, another administration official said, "We didn't say it was mechanical." Now they claim the crash had something to do with the temperature at bin Laden’s supposed compound.

A poorly photo-shopped image of a dead bin Laden embarrassed a large swath of the world press and
several Senators, too. Shortly after newspapers and television stations around the globe ran the image, it was exposed as a shoddy forgery that had been circulating for years. Now Obama said he “decided” not to release any pictures — or any other evidence that any element of the story is true, for that matter.

And then there’s the burial issue. The Obama administration originally
claimed no country would accept the body; so, it was dumped at sea — Mafia style — in accordance with what Obama alleged were Islamic traditions and customs. When prominent Muslim theological leaders repudiated that lie and noted that it was actually a violation of Islamic tenets to bury Osama bin Laden in the ocean, the new line was that the decision was to avoid the creation of a “shrine.” That lie fell apart, too, when it was widely reported that bin Laden’s brand of Islam calls for unmarked graves — building any sort of shrine would have been blasphemous. So far, no new excuses have been concocted for allegedly feeding the body to the fish.

After the numerous discrepancies and falsehoods in the storyline became painfully obvious, the
Associated Press, USA Today, Fox News and other outlets slowly and begrudgingly started to report it. “From the first moments, a good number of the details about bin Laden's killing, on points large and small, have been wrong,” admitted a Fox reporter in one of the more candid acknowledgements to appear in the mainstream press.

But of course, most of the media were also dutifully offering and parroting all manner of excuses. “Fog of war” was to blame for the confusion, claimed the White House spokesman after that excuse was
suggested to him by a member of the “press” corps asking a question. Virtually every major news outlet reporting the changes in the official story promptly blamed “fog of war,” too.

An apologist reporter at
USA Today wrote that “the administration did its best to get the story quickly,” adding “it's common situation with military action.” The paper quoted a Pentagon spokesperson under the Bush administration to bolster its case.

The AP offered a similar excuse along with the “fog of combat” line offered by the White House. “The contradictions and misstatements reflect the fact that even in the case of a highly successful and popular mission, the confusion inherent in a fast-paced, unpredictable military raid conducted under intense pressure in a foreign country does not lend itself immediately to a tidy story line,” the reporter
claimed, citing “some experts.”

Several excuses for the ever-changing story were offered by other publications, too. The possibility that they were deliberate lies or worse was virtually never addressed. But the U.K.
Independent noted: “The impression persists that the administration sought to cast the operation in the most heroic light possible, at the expense of the facts.” 

Now, the President and his spokespeople and subordinates are refusing to offer more details or explanations. The government has also
announced that it will not be releasing pictures or any other evidence to support its claims even as suspicions continue to mount.

But as analysts
pointed out, the newly revealed fact that there was no fire fight begs the question about where the “fog” may have come from. And even more importantly: Why, in the absence of a fire fight, would U.S. forces put a bullet through the brain supposedly containing the most valuable intelligence on the planet? What if bin Laden knew where that alleged nuclear bomb in Europe was located that was set to detonate after his capture or death? None of those questions have been addressed so far.

But prominent critics are sounding the alarm. “When such a foundational story as the demise of bin Laden cannot last 48 hours without acknowledged ‘discrepancies’ that require fundamental alternations to the story, there are grounds for suspicion in addition to the suspicions arising from the absence of a dead body, from the absence of any evidence that bin Laden was killed in the raid or that a raid even took place,” noted Paul Craig Roberts, a senior official in the former Reagan administration in a piece entitled “
The Agendas Behind the bin Laden News Event.”

Roberts raised several important questions, too, as well as some comparisons. “The entire episode could just be another event like the August 4, 1964, Gulf of Tonkin event that never happened but succeeded in launching open warfare against North Vietnam at a huge cost to Americans and Vietnamese and enormous profits to the military/security complex,” he suggested, citing a series of government deceptions that have led to war based on lies and other atrocities.


Roberts suspects there are more lies about the bin Laden narrative than those exposed so far. And he’s certainly not alone. It emerged recently that the man who owned the house next to bin Laden’s supposed compound doesn’t even believe the story either. “To be honest, it’s not true,” he
told Al Jazeera.


As the official story continues to be re-written by the administration and those in the media who simply re-package government press releases, critics and skeptics would seem to be justified in wondering what other lies and "fog of war" changes may emerge in the coming weeks and months. And perhaps even more importantly, we might also wonder if there are lies that may never be exposed in their entirety?



Hey yiddish scum I fucking hate you dirty fuckers! Let's start a fight to the death - yids against the rest!


TRUTH IS NOT RACIST | FACTS ARE NOT HATE